Sub-DistrictPerformance Evaluation On General Government Affairs Implementation In Sleman Regency of 2021-2023
Abstract
Abstract
The sub-district performance evaluation on general government affairs implementation in Sleman Regency of 2021-2023 is a study focuses on the implementation of the municipality's duties and functions in the general government affairs of the Sleman district. There are three major issues with the district's implementation of general government affairs. First, the sub-district as a regional government agency that has territorial aspects but does not hold a position as the authority or regional head of the territory and is not a sectoral administrator such as technical government agency or department in the regional government structure. Second, public service authorities in the sub-district sector have been greatly reduced by using digital government platforms. Third, the village's government functions are geographically located within the sub-district area. Among these issues, it is important to know the performance of the general government affairs in the sub-district of Sleman in order to strengthen the strategic role of sub-districts in regional government. The study uses a descriptive-qualitative approach by collecting data on the implementation of general government affairs in 17 (seven) sub-districts in the Sleman Regency during the period 2021–2023, through observations, surveys, and in-depth interviews. Data analysis techniques use describtive analysis methods to describe and analyze research results. The study's findings indicate that the sub-district's performance of the implementation on general government affairs was lower when compared to the performance of the sub-district as government agency. The performance of sub-distric general government affairs is influenced by collaborative leadership and the implementation of mitigation, facilitation, mediation, supervision, and advocacy functions.
Downloads
References
Cornelis Lay, d. (2002). Desentralisasi dan Demokrasi: Kajian Tentang Kecamatan Sebagai Arena Pengembangan Demokrasi, Pelayanan Publik, Ekonomi dan Intermediary. Yogyakarta: Kerja Sama Ford Foundation dan Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Dennis J Casley, K. K. (1987). Project Monitoring and Evaluation in Agriculture. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
Dewi, N. L. (2019). Dinamika Collaborative Governance Dalam Studi Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, Vol. 3, No. 2 Hal. 200-210.
Dwi Mardiana, S. A. (2022). The Application of Digital Leadership of Subdistrict Head on Public Service Performace with the Delegation of Regent/Mayor Authorities as The Moderating Variable (Case Study of Covid-19 Spread Management in Pendalungan Area). Airlangga Development Journal, 154-159.
Fitriyah, N. (2018). Membangun Kompetensi Pemimpin Dalam Mengelola Organisasi Publik: Strategi dan Aplikasi. Madani Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 79-91.
Halimah, E. (2021). Perilaku Responsif Birokrasi Dalam Pelayanan Publik Pada Kantor Dinas Perikanan dan Kelautan Kota Palopo. Jurnal Sosio Sains, 108-115.
Indonesia, P. R. (2018). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 Tentang Kecamatab.
Indonesia, P. R. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 29 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik.
Jody Zall Kusek, R. C. (2004). Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Jujun Juhana, S. W. (2020). The Importance of Delegation of Authority, Budget Allocation and Leadership in Improving Performace. International Journal of Science and Society, Volume 2, Issue 1, 221-226.
Khelda Ayunita, A. B. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridi Kewenangan Pemerintah Kecamatan Dalam Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Umum di Kota Makasar. Petitum, 2-20.
Mahsun. (2014). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Mardiasmo. (2014). Akuntasi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Mohamad Dafan Inanda, P. S. (2022). Study on Implementing of Regulations on Delegation of Regent's Authority to Subdistrict Head in Probolinggo. Cross Current International Journal of Economics, Management and Media Studies, Volume 4 Issue 5 81-86.
Mohammad Thahir Haning, L. T. (2016). Desentralisasi Kewenangan Pelayanan Publik pada Kecamatan di Kabupaten Pangkep. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan dan Pelayanan Publik, Volume 2 Number 1, 73-92.
Pratama, R. A. (2018). Pergeseran Pelimpahan Sebagian Kewenangan Bupati/Walikota Kepada Camat Pasca Lahirnya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 17 Tahun 2018 tentang Kecamatan. Kemudi: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, Volume 3 Nomor 01, 52-91.
Purwastuti. (2021). Modul Kepemimpinan Kolaboratif: Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Nasional Tingkat I. Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara.
Puspaningtyas, A. (2022, Desember 29). Collaborative Governance: Sebuah Paradigma? Retrieved from Adminsitrasi Publik Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya: https://publik.untag-sby.ac.id/berita-430-collaborative-governance-sebuah-paradigma.html
Rahma Putri Khasanah, T. P. (2021). Analisis Collaborative Governance Dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB) Pada Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 di DKI Jakarta Tahun 2020. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Kebijakan, 155-169.
Silalahi, U. (2011). Reinventing Kepemimpinan di Sektor Publik Untuk Membangun Kepercayaan Warga Kepada Pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu Adminsitrasi, Vol. VIII, No. 3, Hal. 261-274.
Suparman, N. (2017). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pelimpahan Sebagian Kewenangan Bupati kepada Camat di Kecamatan Sagala Herang Kabupaten Subang Tahun 2015. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 89-96.
Vann, P. (2016). Project Monitoring & Evaluation (PME) in Project Cycle Management. US: USAID.
Wargadinata, E. (2016). Kepemimpinan Kolaboratif. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah , Vol. VII, Edisi 1, Hal. 1-14.
Yogyakarta, B. P. (Volume 48, 2024). Sleman Dalam Angka. Sleman: BPS Sleman.
