Elit Korporatisme Industri Garam di Nusa Tenggara Timur
Abstract
This research aims to reveal and explain the pattern of relations between the state (government elite) and the community, both the interest group (association elite) or the wider community (association members) in the salt industry in NTT. As a system of government, corporatism is still practiced, although with a model that is not as idealized by its early thinkers. Corporatism in practice has the opportunity to give birth to new elites as found in the research of the salt industry in NTT. The interests of the elites do not necessarily represent the interests of association members in general. Even in the salt industry, the interests of the elites conflict with the interests of members and the community. Government elites and business associations that have large resources of power manipulate customary institutions, churches, academics and communities to achieve their interests. This system also gives the state (government elite) authority and dominance over various decisions on the utilization of public goods (location of the salt industry or customary land) and determines which entrepreneurs invest (state dominance). Finally, the state is not present as a neutral referee for the contestation of various interests of citizens or associations of interest groups.
Downloads
References
BACCARO, L. (2002) ‘The Construction of “Democratic” Corporatism in Italy’, Politics & Society, 30(2), pp. 327–357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329202030002005.
Chen, L. (2018) ‘Corporatism Reconsidered: Howard J. Wiarda’s Legacy’, Polity, 50(4), pp. 601–611. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/699630.
Iversen, T. (2005) Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kridasakti, S.W. et al. (2022) ‘Chronic Disease of State Corporatism in Indonesian Village Government’, Sriwijaya Law Review, 6(2), p. 304. Available at: https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss2.403.pp304-318.
Lehmbruch, G. (1979) ‘Consociational democracy, class conflict and the new corporatism’, in P.C. Schmitter and Gerhard LEHMBRUCH (eds) Trends towards corporatist intermediation. London: Beverly Hills : SAGE, pp. 53–61.
Lindvall, J. and Sebring, J. (2005) ‘Policy reform and the decline of corporatism in Sweden’, West European Politics, 28(5), pp. 1057–1074. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380500311814.
Mills, C.W. (1956) The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
Molina, O. and Rhodes, M. (2002) ‘CORPORATISME : The Past, Present, and Future of a Concept’, Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), pp. 305–331. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112701.184858.
Mosca, G. (1939) The Rulling Class :Elementi Di Scienza Politica. London: McGraw-Hill Company.
Nyberg, D. and Murray, J. (2023) ‘Corporate populism: How corporations construct and represent “the people” in political contestations’, Journal of Business Research, 162, p. 113879. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113879.
Rhodes, C. and Fleming, P. (2020) ‘Forget political corporate social responsibility’, Organization, 27(6), pp. 943–951. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420928526.
Sahdan, G. et al. (2023) ‘State Corporatism in Village Development Planning’, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 12(2), pp. 403–411. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i2.63514.
Schimitter, P. and Grote Jurgen (1997) The corporatist Sisyphus : past, present and future. Italia.
Schmitter, P.C. (1974) ‘Still the Century of Corporatism?’, The Review of Politics, 36(1), pp. 85–131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500022178.
Schmitter, P.C. (1979) ‘Still the century of corporatism?’, in P.C. Schmitter and Gerhard LEHMBRUCH (eds) Trends toward corporatist intermediatio. London: Beverly Hills : SAGE, pp. 7–52.
Schmitter, P.C. and Streeck, W. (1999) The organization of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies. Cologne.
Siaroff, A. (1999) ‘Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement’, European Journal of Political Research, 36(2), pp. 175–205. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00467.
Slomp, H. (2000) European politics into the twenty-first century: integration and division. Westport: Praeger.
Streeck, W. and Kenworthy, L. (2005) ‘Theories and practices of neocorporatism’, in T. Janoski et al. (eds) the handbook of political sociology: states, civil societies, and globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 441–460.
Truman, D. (1981) The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.
Vilfredo Pareto and Arthur Livingston (1935) The Mind and Society. Edited by Andrew Bongiorno and James Harvey Rogers. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Wiarda, H.J. (1996) Corporatism and Comparative Politics: The Other Great ‘ism’. Dallas: Routledge.
