Analisis Wewenang Pemerintah dalam Kuasa Diskresi Administrasi
Abstract
Analyzing how the government's authority is in the power of administrative discretion is the background for the author to discuss the study of administrative discretion, to determine the authority of an administrative agency or official to make decisions and take actions that are not prescribed by law or regulation, but are consistent with the goals and objectives of the agency or official. Because in essence, this discretion becomes an authority of government officials in issuing decisions or taking actions on their initiative. This study uses a method of data collection based on a literature review study. In using this method, researchers collect data by reading and processing several sources of books, articles, online media, and others as supporting material for their research. Planning carried out by the government and its authority is in line with discretion which is a form of action that has been planned by the authorized government to find a solution to problems that occur within the scope of its government based on statutory rules. Discretion needs to pay attention to procedures for use that can be accounted for morally and legally as regulated in the Act. There is a need for clearer and more effective rules to explain the abuse of authority in the anti-corruption law. Government policies will be categorized as deviant policies if they contain arbitrary elements. In addition, policies are considered deviant if they conflict with the public interest. Furthermore, the Government Administration Law states that the exercise of discretion must be exercised by senior government officials and citizens who have suffered losses due to the use of discretion, and this can be verified through law enforcement efforts or prosecution in the state administrative court
Downloads
References
Basah, S. (1997). Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Peradilan Administrasi Negara di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Berge, J. B. J. M. ten. (1992). Verklarend woordenboek Openbaar Bestuur. Netherlands: H.D. Tjeenk Willink, Samsom.
Damongilala, W. (2018). Larangan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Bagipejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. VI(2), 46–53.
Endang, M. I. A. (2018). Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan / Discretion and Responsbility of Government Officials Based on Law of State Administration. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 1(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.122018.223-244
Ferial, R. M. (2020). Penerapan Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Penyebaran Virus Covid-19 Pada Area Kerja PT. Semen Padang. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 4(2), 271-284.
Hasrul, D. M. (2021). Analisis Pengelolaan Keuangan dalam Peningkatan Pembangunan di Desa Angkasa Pura. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 5(2), 167-176.
Hsb, A. M., & Shanty, V. (2021). Diskresi Sebagai Dasar Pertimbangan Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Law Jurnal, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v1i2.1126
Indroharto. (2005). Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara : Buku II. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Koentjoro, D. H. (2004). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Kosasih, A., & Kenedi, J. (2017). Dinamika Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Dinamika Hukum Administrasi Negara, 1–129.
Lutfil, A. (2015). Diskresi dan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Yuridis, 2(1), 134–150.
Marzuki, H. M. L. (2013). Amanna Gappa. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Amanna Gappa, 21(1), 2–7.
Maulidya, I. (2019). Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan terhadap Kinerja Pengelolaan Keuangan Nagari di Kabupaten Pasaman. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 3(2), 67-78.
Narindra, J. S., & Ispriyarso, B. (2022). Analisis Penghapusan Syarat Tidak Bertentangan dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Penggunaan Diskresi Pada Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(3), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i3.418-432
Nabella, N. (2019). Analisis Kewenangan Camat dalam Era Otonomi Daerah. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 3(2), 144-155.
Ni Putu Gita Loka Chindiyana Dewi, I Nyoman Sujana, & Luh Putu Suryani. (2021). Koordinasi Wewenang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dengan Penegak Hukum Lainnya dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.3056.119-124
Putra, D. P. (2020). Diskresi Dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Badamai Law Journal, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v5i1.9734
Putri, N. E., Helmi, H., Noer, M., & Yossyafra, Y. (2023). The Social and Political Factors on the Decision-Making Process in Land Acquisition for Sicincin-Padang Toll Road Construction, West Sumatera. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 7(1), 40-55.
Syafril, R. (2020). Politik Dinasti dalam Pandangan Islam. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 4(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.24036/jess.v4i1.256
Taufiqurrahman, M. (2019). Kedudukan Diskresi Pejabat Pemerintahan. Jurnal Retentum, 1(1), 48–61.
Tim pusat Kajian Sistem dan Hukum Administrasi Negara. (2016). Kajian Diskresi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan (Vol. 3, Issue April).
Zaqiah Darojad. (2015). Penggunaan Diskresi Oleh Pejabat Pemerintahan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Yang Mengakibatkan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal MP (Manajemen Pemerintahan), vol 5(issue 2), 135.
Zaelani, M. A., Handayani, I. G. K. A. R., & Isharyanto, I. (2019). Asas umum pemerintahan yang baik berlandaskan pancasila sebagai dasar penggunaan diskresi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(3), 458-480.
