Konflik Antar Etnis di Indonesia dalam Analisis Face Negotiation Theory
Abstract
Indonesia is known as a country with a pluralistic society. With the wealth of ethnicity, ethnicity, race, and religion in it, this multicultural society then becomes prone to friction. Not to mention the differences in terms of language, customs, and habits in it. These frictions will in turn lead to conflicts which are then unavoidable. The study of inter-ethnic conflict in Indonesia in the analysis of face negotiation theory was carried out with several objectives, which are: to explain the analysis of face negotiation theory in several cases of ethnic conflict that occurred in Indonesia so that it is expected to be taken into consideration in preventing or dealing with similar conflicts. The method used in this research is qualitative with data sources obtained through literature study (Creswell, 2012). The result of the research is that in the Indonesian phenomenon, many sources said that usually the way Indonesian people in determining their attitude during conflict are by integration or mutual - face. Where the characteristics in it are Apologize, Private talk, Remain calm, Problem solve, and Respect. This behavior is a characteristic of collectivistic culture that is indeed embraced by Indonesian people in general
Downloads
References
Dainton, M., & Zelley, E. (2018). Applying Communication Theory for Professional Life: a Practical Introduction 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Elvinaro, A. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Public Relation Kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Griffin, E., Ledbetter, A., & Sparks, G. (2015). A First Look at Communication Theory (9th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Indreswari, Eswandani, P., Purwasito, A., & Satyawan, A. (2020). Face Negotiation in Conflict Resolution and Friendship Building among Indonesia's Javanese and NTT Youth in Solo. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change Volume 12 Issue 10.
Kriyantono, R. (2006). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Littlejohn, S., Karen, A. F., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of Human Communication (11th Edition). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Neuliep, J., & Johnson, M. (2015). United States face, facework, and conflict styles during interpersonal conflict: An application of face-negotiation theory. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 1-9.
Nur, V. W., & Yasir. (2019). Negosiasi Muka dalam Komunikasi Antarbudaya Masyarakat Transmigran (Jawa) dan Penduduk Lokal (Melayu) di Desa Kuala Kilan Kecamatan Batang Cenaku Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu Riau. JOM FISIP Vol.6: Edisi II.
Oetzel, J., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication research, 30(6), 599-624.
Putra, Razid, K., Hairunnisa, & Sabirudin. (2018). Pola Komunikasi Masyarakat Desa Bangunrejo Kecamatan Tenggarong Seberang dalam Meredam Konflik Etnis. eJournal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6 (1) 2018, 441-455.
Sari, M. Y., & Salam, N. E. (2017). Komunikasi Antarbudaya Studi Negosiasi Wajah dalam Interaksi Etnik Batak dan Etnik Minang di Duri Keluraham Gajah Sakti Kecamatan Mandau Kabupaten Bengkalis. JOM FISIP Vol.4 No.2.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2017). Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory; Tracking Its Evolutionary Journey. Routledge.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International journal of intercultural relations, 22(2) Elsevier, 187-225.
West, R., & Turner, L. (2008). Pengantar Teori Komunikasi:Analisis dan Aplikasi (Introduction Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Zhang, Q., Ting-Toomey, S., & Oetzel, J. (2014). Linking Emotion to the Conflict Face-Negotiation Theory: A U.S.-China Investigation of the Mediating Effects of Anger, Compassion, and Guilt in Interpersonal Conflict. Human Communication Research, 373-395.
