Tanggung Jawab Direksi atas Terjadinya Pailit Perseroan Terbatas
Abstract
This research was conducted to find out how the directors' accountability mechanism caused by an error or negligence caused the limited company to go bankrupt and how the legal consequences on the bankruptcy of a limited liability company. This type of research was classified as a normative legal research or also called doctrinal research, namely research that examined the law as a separate system that was separate from various other systems in society so as to provide a boundary between the legal system with other systems. The approach method used was the statutory approach; and Conceptual Approach. In principle, the Board of Directors was not personally responsible for acts committed for and on behalf of the company based on its authority. The scope of conduct that would be personally accounted for by the directors of the company was negligence because the directors did not fulfill the contents of the agreement and mistakes because the directors commit acts against the law. Bankruptcy of a Limited Liability Company was the bankruptcy of itself, not the bankruptcy of its management, even though the bankruptcy was due to the negligence of its management. So that management should not be held liable jointly for any losses due to negligence and could only be held accountable if the company's assets were not sufficient to cover losses due to bankruptcy Article 90 paragraph (2) of the Limited Liability Company Law).
Downloads
References
Fuady, Munir. (2005). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Indriati, Maria Farida. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 1. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Jono. (2017). Hukum Kepailitan. Cetakan Kelima. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kesowo, Bambang. (1995). Fiduciary Dimes Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1995. Newsletter. No. 23/VI/Desember 1995.
Khairandy, Ridwan. (2014). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Prasetya, Rudhi. (2002). Maatschap, Firma dan Persekutuan Komanditer. Bandung:Citra Aditya.
Prodikoro, Wirjono. (2000). Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2006). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sastrawidjaja, Sofjan. (1996). Hukum Pidana (Asas Hukum Pidana Sampai Dengan Alasan Peniadaan Pidana). Bandung: Armico.
Shubhan, M. Hadi. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sianturi, S. R. (1996). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Alumni.
Sinaga, V. Harlen. (2012). Batas-Batas Tanggung Jawab Perdata Direksi. Cetakan Kesatu. Jakarta: Adinatha Mulia.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy (2002). Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Failissementsverordening Juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1998. Jakarta: Grafiti.
Subekti. (1984). Aneka Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni.
Subekti. (2005). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Suherman, Ade Maman. (2004). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Tumbuan, Fred B. G. (2007). Presentation on Organ of the Perseroan Terbatan According to Law No. 40 Year 2007. Makalah. Disajikan pada Seminar Sehari. “Aspek-aspek Penting Undang-undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta, 28 November 2007.
Wilamarta, Misahardi. (Tanpa Tahun). Hak Pemegang Saham Minoritas Dalam Rangka Good Corporate Governance, Program Pasca Sarjana, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.