Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penyertaan (Deelneming) Yang Tidak Memiliki Kualitas Pribadi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi

  • Abdul Muflihun
  • Ufran Ufran

Abstract

This study was to determine the criminal liability for the actors of participants who did not have personal qualities in corruption and to find out the legal considerations of judges in court decisions against the actors of participants who did not have personal qualities in criminal acts of corruption. The research method used was a normative legal research method. Participants who had no personal quality could be held crimanally accountable, the basis of the consideration was first because there was no clear legal basis and secondly supported by the opinions of several experts in criminal law. The relationship of each participant was not separate from one another but becomes a unity, meaning that one actors could also determine the other actors accountability. A clarity was needed on whether or not perpetrators who did not have personal qualities were accountable for their actions, namely by making legal decisions that remain jurisprudential or making new articles formulated in the upcoming law on corruption eradication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alamsyah, Wana, dkk. (2018). ICW (Indonesia Corruption watch): Laporan tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi 2018. 25 Februari 2018.
Anti Corruption Clearing House (ACCH). (2018). Statistik Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Tahun. http://acch.kpk.go.id, KPK. Diakses tanggal 28 januari 2020.
Hamzah, Andi. (2014). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum pidana. Cetakan kesatu. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Komisi Pemberantas Korupsi (KPK) Indonesia. (2019). Statistik Penindakan. https://www.kpk.go.id. (diakses pada tanggal 29 Januari 2020).
Lamintang, P.A.F. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Keenam. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada media Group.
Moeljatno. (1979). Hukum Pidana Delik-Delik Penyertaan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Cetakan kesembilan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Moningka, Franco Marcello. (2018). Penerapan Ajaran Deelneming Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal lex Crime. Vol. VII/No. 5/Jul/2018.
Prododikoro, Wirjono. (2014). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Cetakan Keenam. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Rohrohmana, Basir. (2017). Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal YURIDIKA Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga. Volume 32 No. 2, Mei 2017.
Soerodibroto, Soenarto. (1982). KUHP & KUHAP Dilengkapi Jurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung dan Hoge Raad. Jakarta: Soenarto & Assosiates.
Ulfa, Linda. (2017). Penerapan Ajaran Turut Serta Kasus Korupsi Dikaitkan Teori Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 19, No. 2, (Agustus, 2017).
Published
2020-06-01
How to Cite
MUFLIHUN, Abdul; UFRAN, Ufran. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penyertaan (Deelneming) Yang Tidak Memiliki Kualitas Pribadi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), [S.l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 67-82, june 2020. ISSN 2550-0147. Available at: <http://jess.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/JESS/article/view/247>. Date accessed: 07 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.24036/jess.v4i1.247.