Eksistensi Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha dalam Penanganan Persekongkolan Tender dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia
Abstract
This study aimed to examine and analyze the legal position of the the Supervision Commission as the only institution dealing with competition law in Indonesia legal system and determine the existence of law enforcement of the Commission as the only institution related to tender collusion (conspiracy) viewed from the Indonesian legal perspective. This was a normative study (research), with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicated that the position of the Supervision Commission as the only institution dealing with competition law in Indonesia in the justice system was independent from the influence of other institutions in resolving disputes on unfair business competition in Indonesia; and the existence of the Commission is the only institution dealing with competition law in Indonesia in carrying out its duties and authorities in accordance with the mandate of the Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition.
Downloads
References
Fuady, Munir (1999). Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Menyongsong Era Persaingan Sehat. Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hermansyah. (2009). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). (2016). Laporan kinerja KPPU 2016.
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). (2017). Laporan kinerja KPPU 2017.
Krisanto, Yakub Adi. (2008). Terobosan Hukum Putusan KPPU dalam Mengembangkan Penafsiran Hukum Persekongkolan Tender (Analisis Putusan KPPU Terhadap Pasal 22 Uu Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Pasca Tahun 2006). Jurnal Hukum Bisnis. Volume 27 Nomor 3, 2008.
Lubis, Andi Fahmi, et.al. (2009). Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks & Konteks. Jakarta: ROV Creative Media.
Ma’rif, Syamsul. (2002). Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis. Vol. 19 Mei-Juni, 2002.
Margono, Suyud. (2009). Hukum Anti Monopoli. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Peraturan KPPU Nomor 2 tahun 2010 tentang …………………..
Saliman, Abdul R. (2004). Esensi Hukum Bisnis Indonesia Teori dan Contoh Kasus. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sukino, Sadono. (2003). Hukum Anti Monopoli: Menyongsong Era Persaingan Sehat. cet.II. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Usman, Rachmadi. (2013). Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Wafiya (2014). Politik Hukum Pembentukan Undang-undang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Volume 8 No.4, Oktober – Desember 2014.
Sumber Internet/Online:
https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt592e75913b6c7/ini-catatan-kinerja-kppu-selama-17-tahun/, diakses pada tangal 21 agustus 2019, pukul 13.00 wita.
http://www.kppu.go.id/docs/LaporanKeuangan/Renstra%20KPPU%202015-2019.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 27 agustus 2019, pukul 23.00 wita.
Detik News, “KPPU: 80 Persen Persekongkolan Tender Terkait Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa”, di akses dari https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3371375/kppu--80-persen-persekongkolan-tenderterkait- pengadaan-barang-dan-jasa, pada tanggal 21 agustus 2019.
